Arguments for God's Existence Lesson 47 of 157

Natural Theology

What We Can Know About God Through Reason and Nature

Can we know anything about God apart from the Bible? Is there knowledge of the divine available to all people through reason and observation of the natural world? These questions define the field of natural theology—the attempt to learn about God through nature and reason rather than special revelation. Understanding natural theology is essential for apologetics because it provides common ground for conversations with those who don't accept Scripture's authority.

What Is Natural Theology?

Natural theology is the branch of theology that seeks knowledge of God through natural means—reason, observation, and philosophical reflection—rather than through special revelation like Scripture or direct divine communication. It asks: What can we know about God from the world around us and the rational capacities within us?

Definition

Natural theology is the pursuit of knowledge about God's existence and attributes through human reason and observation of the natural world, apart from special revelation.

Natural theology contrasts with revealed theology, which derives its knowledge from God's special self-disclosure—supremely in Scripture and in Christ. Revealed theology tells us things we could never discover on our own: the Trinity, the incarnation, the plan of salvation. Natural theology addresses more basic questions: Does God exist? What is God like? What does God require?

The relationship between natural and revealed theology has been debated throughout Christian history. Some see them as complementary—natural theology establishing God's existence, revealed theology telling us who God is and what He has done. Others are more skeptical of natural theology's value or possibility. We'll explore these perspectives after examining the biblical and historical foundations.

Biblical Foundations

Does Scripture support natural theology? Several passages suggest that God has revealed Himself in nature in ways accessible to all people:

Romans 1:18-20

The most explicit biblical support for natural theology comes from Paul:

"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."

— Romans 1:18-20

Paul makes several remarkable claims here:

God has revealed Himself in creation. "What may be known about God" is available through "what has been made." Creation functions as a revelation of the Creator.

This revelation is clear. God's attributes have been "clearly seen" and are "plain" to people. This isn't obscure or ambiguous but evident to those who look.

This revelation includes significant content. Specifically, "God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature" are revealed. We can know something of who God is, not just that He exists.

This revelation renders people accountable. People are "without excuse" because they have suppressed truth they actually possessed. The problem is not insufficient evidence but willful rejection.

Psalm 19:1-4

The psalmist celebrates creation's testimony to God:

"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world."

— Psalm 19:1-4

Creation "declares," "proclaims," "pours forth speech," and "reveals knowledge." This is revelatory language—creation communicates truth about God. And this message reaches "all the earth" and "the ends of the world"—it's universal, available to all people everywhere.

Acts 14:15-17

When Paul and Barnabas were mistaken for gods in Lystra, they appealed to natural revelation:

"We are bringing you good news, telling you to turn from these worthless things to the living God, who made the heavens and the earth and the sea and everything in them. In the past, he let all nations go their own way. Yet he has not left himself without testimony: He has shown kindness by giving you rain from heaven and crops in their seasons; he provides you with plenty of food and fills your hearts with joy."

— Acts 14:15-17

God "has not left himself without testimony"—even among pagans who lacked special revelation. His goodness in providence testifies to His reality and character.

Acts 17:22-28

At the Areopagus in Athens, Paul engaged Greek philosophers using natural theology:

"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. 'For in him we live and move and have our being.'"

— Acts 17:24-28

Paul argues from creation, providence, and human nature to the existence and attributes of God. He even quotes pagan poets approvingly. This is natural theology in action—finding common ground with unbelievers through observations available to all.

Historical Development

Natural theology has a rich history in Christian thought, though with significant debates about its scope and validity.

The Church Fathers

Early Christian thinkers engaged Greek philosophy, finding points of contact between pagan wisdom and Christian truth. Justin Martyr saw Greek philosophy as preparation for the gospel—seeds of the Logos scattered among the nations. Augustine drew on Platonic insights while transforming them through Christian revelation. The Fathers generally affirmed that reason could know something of God, though they emphasized revelation's necessity for salvation.

Medieval Synthesis

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) developed the most influential synthesis of natural and revealed theology. He distinguished between truths knowable by natural reason (God's existence, basic moral law) and truths known only through revelation (the Trinity, incarnation, salvation). His "Five Ways"—arguments for God's existence—became the classical statement of natural theology in the Western tradition.

Aquinas believed natural theology could demonstrate God's existence with certainty, though he recognized that few people have the time, ability, or inclination to follow philosophical arguments. For most, revelation provides the knowledge that reason could theoretically attain but practically doesn't.

Reformation Perspectives

The Protestant Reformers had complex relationships with natural theology. Luther sometimes spoke harshly of human reason's pretensions, famously calling reason "the devil's whore" when it presumed to judge divine revelation. But he also affirmed that reason has legitimate uses in its proper sphere.

Calvin affirmed the sensus divinitatis—an innate sense of God implanted in every human heart—and the knowledge of God available through creation. But he emphasized that sin has so corrupted human reason that natural knowledge, while real, is suppressed and distorted. Saving knowledge comes only through Scripture illuminated by the Holy Spirit.

The Reformed tradition generally affirms natural revelation (God has revealed Himself in nature) while being skeptical of natural theology (human ability to correctly interpret that revelation without Scripture's guidance).

Enlightenment and After

The Enlightenment elevated reason and challenged traditional theology. Some thinkers pursued natural theology apart from revelation—deism affirmed a Creator known through reason but rejected supernatural revelation. Others, like David Hume and Immanuel Kant, critiqued natural theology's arguments, challenging the cosmological and teleological proofs.

In response, some Christians abandoned natural theology entirely, emphasizing revelation alone (Karl Barth is the most famous example). Others continued to develop and refine arguments, leading to the contemporary renaissance of natural theology through thinkers like Alvin Plantinga, William Lane Craig, and Richard Swinburne.

Karl Barth's Rejection

Swiss theologian Karl Barth (1886-1968) famously rejected natural theology with a resounding "Nein!" He argued that natural theology represented human attempts to reach God on our own terms—the essence of idolatry. True knowledge of God comes only through God's self-revelation in Christ. The attempt to know God apart from Christ produces false gods.

Barth's critique has force against certain forms of natural theology that become substitutes for the gospel. But most proponents see natural theology not as a replacement for revelation but as a preparation for it—removing obstacles, establishing God's existence, creating openness to hear more.

The Purposes of Natural Theology

Why pursue natural theology? What purposes does it serve in the Christian life and mission?

Common Ground for Apologetics

Natural theology provides common ground for conversations with unbelievers who don't accept Scripture's authority. We can't simply quote Bible verses to someone who doesn't believe the Bible is God's Word. But we can reason together about what creation reveals, what moral experience implies, what the existence of anything at all requires. Natural theology meets people where they are.

Confirming Faith

For believers, natural theology confirms what Scripture teaches. Seeing that philosophical arguments support God's existence strengthens faith. It demonstrates that Christianity is not blind belief but intellectually credible—that faith and reason work together rather than against each other.

Removing Obstacles

Many people have intellectual barriers to faith—they think science has disproved God, that belief is irrational, that Christianity requires intellectual suicide. Natural theology removes these barriers by showing that belief in God is philosophically defensible, even compelling. It clears the ground for the gospel.

Demonstrating Accountability

Natural theology underscores that unbelief is not intellectually innocent. If God's existence is knowable through reason and nature, then rejection of God is not mere ignorance but suppression of truth. People are genuinely "without excuse." This doesn't mean we approach unbelievers arrogantly, but it means we can confidently proclaim truth they already, at some level, know.

Glorifying God

Ultimately, natural theology glorifies God by recognizing His self-revelation in creation. The heavens declare His glory, and we join that declaration when we trace the evidence of His handiwork. Studying natural theology is an act of worship—marveling at what God has made known of Himself.

The Limits of Natural Theology

While affirming natural theology's value, we must also recognize its limits:

It Cannot Save

Natural theology can establish God's existence but cannot reveal the way of salvation. Knowing that God exists doesn't tell us how to be reconciled to Him. For that, we need the gospel—the good news of what God has done in Christ. Natural theology prepares for the gospel; it doesn't replace it.

It Provides Limited Content

Natural theology reveals that God exists and something of His attributes—power, wisdom, goodness. But it cannot reveal the Trinity, the incarnation, or the atonement. These require special revelation. Natural theology gives us theism; Scripture gives us Christianity.

It Is Affected by Sin

Human reason is not neutral or unaffected by the Fall. Sin distorts our thinking, suppresses uncomfortable truths, and generates rationalizations for what we want to believe. Natural theology remains possible, but it's hindered by our fallenness. We need Scripture to correct our distortions and the Spirit to illuminate our understanding.

It Rarely Persuades Alone

In practice, arguments seldom convert people by themselves. Worldview change involves relationships, experiences, and the Holy Spirit's work alongside intellectual factors. Natural theology is valuable but not sufficient. It's one tool among many, not a silver bullet.

"The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned."

— 1 Corinthians 2:14 (ESV)

Types of Natural Theology Arguments

Natural theology encompasses various arguments for God's existence. We'll examine several in detail in subsequent lessons, but here's an overview:

Cosmological Arguments

These argue from the existence of the universe to a First Cause or Necessary Being. Why does anything exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? The universe doesn't explain itself; it points beyond itself to something that does. Key versions include the Kalam cosmological argument and Leibniz's argument from contingency.

Teleological Arguments

These argue from design or purpose in nature to an intelligent Designer. The intricate complexity of biological organisms, the fine-tuning of physical constants, and the information content of DNA all suggest purposive intelligence. Nature looks designed because it is designed.

Moral Arguments

These argue from objective moral values and duties to a Moral Lawgiver. If some things are really right and others really wrong—not just matters of opinion—then morality requires grounding beyond human convention. God's character provides that ground.

Ontological Arguments

These argue from the very concept of God to His existence. If we can conceive of a maximally great being, such a being must exist in reality—since a being that existed only in imagination would not be maximally great. These arguments are controversial but have had able defenders.

Arguments from Consciousness and Reason

These argue that the existence of conscious minds and the reliability of reason require a theistic explanation. Naturalism struggles to explain how mindless matter produces minds or why evolved brains would be reliable for discovering truth. Theism explains both.

Arguments from Religious Experience

These argue from the widespread human experience of the divine. Billions of people across all cultures have reported encountering God. While not proof, this provides significant evidence that something real is being experienced.

Practicing Natural Theology

How should we approach natural theology in our apologetic practice?

Know the arguments. Study the major arguments thoroughly. Understand their logic, their historical development, and common objections. Being able to articulate arguments clearly and respond to challenges is essential.

Use arguments appropriately. Arguments are tools for particular purposes. The cosmological argument addresses different questions than the moral argument. Match the argument to the conversation—to the person's questions, objections, and needs.

Combine arguments cumulatively. Individual arguments may not be conclusive, but together they form a powerful cumulative case. Multiple independent lines of evidence converging on theism create a stronger case than any single argument alone.

Remember the person. Arguments are for people, not just for intellectual exercise. Engage the person, not just their position. Listen to their concerns. Use arguments to serve relationships, not to win debates.

Point beyond arguments. Natural theology prepares for the gospel; it doesn't replace it. Having established God's existence, point people to the God who has revealed Himself—in Scripture, in Christ, in the Christian community. Arguments open doors; walk through them with the gospel.

Pray. Natural theology operates in a spiritual context. We're not merely exchanging ideas but engaging in spiritual warfare. Pray for those you're speaking with. Pray for wisdom. Depend on the Spirit who alone can open blind eyes.

"Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD."

— Isaiah 1:18 (ESV)

Conclusion: Faith Seeking Understanding

Natural theology represents faith seeking understanding—believers using reason to explore what can be known about God through creation. It has deep biblical roots, a rich historical tradition, and significant contemporary relevance. While it cannot replace revelation or save anyone, it plays an important role in apologetics, providing common ground, removing obstacles, and confirming faith.

The God who inspired Scripture is the same God who created the universe and made humans rational. We should expect these revelations to cohere—and they do. Nature points to its Creator, reason recognizes design, and the moral law reflects the Lawgiver's character. Natural theology traces these pointers, following the evidence wherever it leads.

In the lessons that follow, we'll examine specific arguments in detail—cosmological, teleological, and moral. Each provides evidence that the God of the Bible is also the God of creation, knowable not only through His Word but through His works. The heavens declare His glory, and we have the privilege of joining that declaration as we reason together about the One who made us for Himself.

"For from him and through him and for him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen."

— Romans 11:36

💬

Discussion Questions

  1. Romans 1:18-20 says that God's attributes are "clearly seen" in creation, leaving people "without excuse." How does this passage support natural theology? What does it suggest about why people nevertheless reject God?
  2. The lesson discusses Karl Barth's rejection of natural theology. What is valid in his concern? How might we affirm natural theology's value while avoiding the dangers Barth identified?
  3. How have you used (or could you use) natural theology in conversations with unbelievers? What arguments or observations have been most helpful for establishing common ground?