A Pattern of Silencing Dissent
On January 7, 2015, two gunmen entered the offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris and murdered twelve people. Their crime? Publishing cartoons of Muhammad. As they fled, the attackers shouted, "We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad!" and "Allahu Akbar!"
Many Western commentators were shocked that anyone would kill over cartoons. But students of Islamic history were not surprised. The Charlie Hebdo attack was not an aberration but a continuation of a tradition that stretches back to Muhammad himself—a tradition of silencing critics through violence.
During his lifetime, Muhammad ordered or sanctioned the assassination of numerous individuals whose only crime was mocking him, writing poetry against him, or criticizing his claims. These assassinations are recorded in the earliest Islamic sources—the Sira (biographical traditions), the hadith collections, and the writings of classical Muslim scholars. They are not anti-Islamic propaganda but mainstream Islamic history.
Understanding this historical pattern helps explain why criticism of Islam is so dangerous today, why apostates fear for their lives, and why "blasphemy" remains a killing offense in much of the Muslim world. It also reveals a profound difference between Muhammad and Jesus, who blessed those who persecuted him and commanded his followers to love their enemies.
Asma bint Marwan: The Mother Who Mocked
Asma bint Marwan was a poetess in Medina who composed verses criticizing Muhammad and mocking the men of Medina for following him. Her poetry has not survived in full, but fragments quoted in the sources suggest she ridiculed the Medinan Arabs for accepting a foreign leader and abandoning their traditional ways.
According to Ibn Ishaq and other early sources, after hearing her poetry, Muhammad asked: "Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?"
"When the Messenger of God heard what she had said, he said, 'Who will rid me of Marwan's daughter?' Umayr ibn Adiy al-Khatmi, who was with him, heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her."
— Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah (as preserved by Ibn Sa'd)The assassin, Umayr ibn Adiy, entered her home at night. She was sleeping with her children, including an infant at her breast. He removed the baby and then killed her with his sword.
When Umayr returned to Muhammad and reported what he had done, he was troubled, wondering if he had sinned. Muhammad's response:
"You have helped God and His apostle, O Umayr!" When he asked if he would have to bear any consequences for this, the Messenger of God said, "Two goats won't butt their heads about her."
— Ibn Ishaq; Ibn Sa'd, Kitab al-Tabaqat al-KabirIn other words: she was worthless. Her death didn't matter. The man who had just murdered a mother in her bed with her children around her was commended for serving God.
Some modern Muslim scholars question the authenticity of this particular account, noting weaknesses in the chain of transmission. However, similar assassinations are recorded in sources considered fully reliable (sahih). Even if one disputes this specific incident, the broader pattern is undeniable and documented in unimpeachable sources.
Abu Afak: The Old Poet
Abu Afak was a Jewish man said to be 120 years old—a poet who had lived in Medina since before Muhammad's arrival. He wrote verses criticizing Muhammad and urging the people of Medina to resist him.
One of his poems contained these lines (preserved in Ibn Ishaq):
"I have lived a long time, but I have never seen
An assembly or collection of people
More faithful to their undertaking
And their allies when called upon
Than the sons of Qayla when they assembled,
Mountains who would not submit
A rider came to them splitting the community
He says what is permitted and what is forbidden..."
The poem praised the pre-Islamic Medinan Arabs for their loyalty and honor, implicitly criticizing them for abandoning these traditions to follow Muhammad. In response:
"The Messenger of God said, 'Who will deal with this rascal for me?' Salim ibn Umayr went forth and killed him."
— Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul AllahAn elderly poet, well over a century old, was murdered in his sleep for the crime of writing critical verses.
Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf: The Jewish Poet
The assassination of Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf is recorded in the most authoritative hadith collections, including Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, leaving no room for dispute about its authenticity.
Ka'b was a wealthy Jewish poet whose mother was from the Banu Nadir tribe. After the Muslim victory at the Battle of Badr (624 AD), Ka'b traveled to Mecca, where he composed elegies for the Meccan dead and poems criticizing Muhammad. Some sources also suggest he wrote love poetry about Muslim women, which was considered deeply offensive.
"The Prophet said, 'Who is willing to kill Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?' Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, 'O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?' The Prophet said, 'Yes.'"
— Sahih al-Bukhari 4037Deception Authorized
Muhammad bin Maslama asked permission to deceive Ka'b in order to get close enough to kill him:
"Muhammad bin Maslama said, 'Then allow me to say a (false) thing (to deceive Ka'b).' The Prophet said, 'You may say it.'"
— Sahih al-Bukhari 4037With Muhammad's explicit permission to lie, the assassins approached Ka'b pretending to be dissatisfied with Muhammad and seeking a loan. They arranged to return at night, ostensibly to bring collateral for the loan. When Ka'b came out to meet them—a wealthy man trusting men who had just dined with him—they grabbed him, held him down, and stabbed him to death.
"So Muhammad bin Maslama went out with Ka'b's foster brother and said, 'When Ka'b comes, I will touch his hair and smell it, and when you see that I have got hold of his head, strike him.' Ka'b bin al-Ashraf came down to them... then he said, 'Will you allow me to smell your head?' Ka'b said, 'Yes.' Muhammad smelled it and made his companions smell it as well. Then he requested Ka'b again, 'Will you let me (smell your head)?' Ka'b said, 'Yes.' When Muhammad got a strong hold of him, he said (to his companions), 'Get at him!' So they killed him."
— Sahih al-Bukhari 4037They cut off Ka'b's head and brought it to Muhammad. He rejoiced at the news.
The Aftermath
When the Jews of Medina protested this murder, Muhammad's response established a terrifying precedent:
"The Messenger of God said, 'Whoever of the Jews falls into your hands, kill him.' So Muhayyisa bin Mas'ud fell upon Ibn Sunayna, one of the Jewish merchants... and killed him."
— Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul AllahIbn Sunayna had no connection to Ka'b; he was simply a Jewish merchant killed because Muhammad had ordered Jews to be killed. When Muhayyisa's own brother (who had not yet converted to Islam) rebuked him for killing a man who had been his friend and trading partner, Muhayyisa reportedly said he would kill his own brother too if Muhammad commanded it.
Other Documented Assassinations
The pattern extended to numerous other critics of Muhammad:
Abu Rafi (Sallam ibn Abu al-Huqayq)
A Jewish leader who helped organize opposition to Muhammad. He was assassinated in his bed at night by a group of Muslims who infiltrated his fortress in Khaybar. His wife's screams nearly alerted the guards, but the assassins escaped. The account is recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari (4039-4040).
Khalid ibn Sufyan
A chief who was allegedly gathering forces against Muhammad. Abdullah ibn Unays was sent to assassinate him. According to the account, Abdullah deceived Khalid, gained his trust, and then struck him dead while he walked beside him at night.
Al-Nadr ibn al-Harith
A Meccan prisoner captured at the Battle of Badr. His crime? He had publicly mocked Muhammad in Mecca, telling Persian tales and claiming his stories were as good as Muhammad's revelations. After Badr, while other prisoners were being ransomed, Muhammad ordered Ali to execute al-Nadr.
Uqba ibn Abu Mu'ayt
Another Badr prisoner who had publicly insulted Muhammad in Mecca. When he was brought forward for execution, he asked, "Who will take care of my children?" Muhammad reportedly replied, "Hellfire," and ordered him killed.
The Conquest of Mecca: The Hit List
When Muhammad conquered Mecca in 630 AD, he declared a general amnesty— with exceptions. Certain people were to be killed "even if they are found beneath the curtains of the Ka'ba." Among them:
- Abdullah ibn Sa'd — A former scribe who had apostasized after claiming Muhammad let him alter the Quran's wording
- Ikrima ibn Abu Jahl — Son of one of Muhammad's greatest enemies (later pardoned)
- Two singing girls — Slaves who had sung satirical songs mocking Muhammad (one was killed, one later pardoned)
- Al-Huwayrith — Killed for having insulted Muhammad
- Miqyas — Killed for apostasy and murder
The presence of singing girls on this death list is particularly striking. Their only offense was singing songs that mocked Muhammad. For this, at least one lost her life.
The Theological Foundation
Why did Muhammad react so violently to criticism? The theological structure of Islam provides the answer.
Muhammad as the Standard
In Islam, Muhammad is not merely a messenger; he is the "seal of the prophets" (Quran 33:40) and the "excellent example" (Quran 33:21) whose words and deeds (the Sunnah) are second only to the Quran as sources of law. To insult Muhammad is to attack the very foundation of Islam.
Quranic Warrant
The Quran itself threatens those who "annoy" or insult Muhammad and the believers:
"Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger—Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating punishment. And those who harm believing men and believing women for [something] other than what they have earned have certainly borne upon themselves a slander and manifest sin."
— Quran 33:57-58"Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land."
— Quran 5:33"Waging war" against Allah and his messenger has been interpreted by classical Islamic scholarship to include verbal opposition—spreading "corruption" through criticism, mockery, or blasphemy.
Classical Legal Consensus
Classical Islamic jurisprudence is unanimous: insulting Muhammad is a capital offense. The major schools of Islamic law all agree on this point, differing only on details like whether the offender should be given a chance to repent.
- Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328): "Whoever curses the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, Muslim or non-Muslim, must be killed."
- Qadi Iyad (d. 1149): "All who curse Muhammad, may peace be upon him, or blame him or attribute imperfection to him... is to be killed without demanding repentance."
This is not "extremist" interpretation; it is mainstream classical Islamic scholarship.
The Modern Continuation
The assassinations ordered by Muhammad set a pattern that continues today:
A Partial List of Modern Victims
- 1989: Ayatollah Khomeini issues fatwa calling for the death of Salman Rushdie for his novel The Satanic Verses. Rushdie's translators were attacked (one killed in Japan).
- 2004: Theo van Gogh, Dutch filmmaker, murdered in Amsterdam for his film Submission, which criticized Islam's treatment of women.
- 2005: Danish cartoon crisis begins after Jyllands-Posten publishes cartoons of Muhammad. Worldwide protests result in over 200 deaths.
- 2011: Charlie Hebdo offices firebombed after publishing a Muhammad cartoon.
- 2015: Charlie Hebdo massacre—12 killed.
- 2020: Samuel Paty, French schoolteacher, beheaded for showing Muhammad cartoons in a class on free speech.
- 2022: Salman Rushdie stabbed multiple times in New York, losing an eye—33 years after Khomeini's fatwa.
These are not isolated incidents by "extremists who misunderstand Islam." They are the direct continuation of a tradition established by Muhammad himself and codified in 1,400 years of Islamic jurisprudence.
Blasphemy Laws Today
At least a dozen Muslim-majority countries have blasphemy laws that carry the death penalty or life imprisonment. Pakistan's blasphemy laws have been used to persecute Christians, Ahmadis, and Muslims accused of disrespecting Muhammad or the Quran. Mob violence often targets the accused before any legal process.
The Contrast with Christ
The contrast between Muhammad's response to mockery and Jesus's response could not be more stark:
Jesus Was Mocked
Throughout his ministry and especially during his trial and crucifixion, Jesus endured severe mockery:
"Then they spit in his face and struck him. And some slapped him, saying, 'Prophesy to us, you Christ! Who is it that struck you?'"
— Matthew 26:67-68"And kneeling before him, they mocked him, saying, 'Hail, King of the Jews!' And they spit on him and took the reed and struck him on the head."
— Matthew 27:29-30Jesus's Response
Jesus did not call for the death of his mockers. Instead:
"When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly."
— 1 Peter 2:23"Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."
— Luke 23:34Jesus's Teaching
Jesus taught his followers to respond to persecution with love:
"But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven."
— Matthew 5:44-45"Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them."
— Romans 12:14Muhammad killed those who mocked him. Jesus blessed those who crucified him. This is not a minor difference; it is a fundamental divergence in character, teaching, and example.
The Christian Response
1. We Must Know the History
Christians cannot afford ignorance about these events. When a Muslim tells you that Islam respects free speech, or that violence against critics is un-Islamic, you should be able to respectfully point to the historical record.
2. We Must Not Respond in Kind
Our response to learning about Muhammad's assassinations should never be to advocate violence against Muslims. We follow a different example—one who told Peter to put away his sword (Matthew 26:52).
3. We Must Defend Free Speech
The ability to question, critique, and even satirize religious claims is essential for a free society and for the spread of the Gospel. Christians should defend this freedom, even when it is used against Christianity itself.
4. We Must Share the Gospel
Many Muslims have never examined the historical record of Muhammad's treatment of critics. Sharing this information—gently, respectfully, with documentation—can raise important questions. And the contrast with Christ's response to his enemies opens the door to the Gospel.
Conclusion: Two Responses to Mockery
When Asma bint Marwan wrote poems mocking Muhammad, she was murdered in her bed. When Jesus hung dying on the cross while soldiers mocked him, he prayed for their forgiveness.
When Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf composed elegies for Muhammad's enemies, he was deceived and assassinated. When Stephen, the first Christian martyr, was being stoned to death, he prayed, "Lord, do not hold this sin against them" (Acts 7:60).
When cartoonists in Paris drew images of Muhammad, they were shot dead in their office. When Christians have been mocked, marginalized, and martyred throughout history, they have followed their Lord's example of patient endurance and forgiveness.
The founders of Islam and Christianity left two very different examples of how to respond to criticism and mockery. One leads to death. The other leads to life.
"For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in his steps."
— 1 Peter 2:21Discussion Questions
- How does the historical pattern of silencing critics—from seventh-century poets to Charlie Hebdo—challenge the claim that 'true Islam' is peaceful? How might you discuss this with a Muslim who insists that violent responses to blasphemy are un-Islamic?
- Compare Muhammad's authorization of deception in the assassination of Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf with Jesus's teaching that 'the truth will set you free' (John 8:32). What does this contrast reveal about the character of each figure?
- In an increasingly secular society, how can Christians defend the importance of free speech while also maintaining respect for religious beliefs? How does Jesus's example help us navigate the tension between truth-telling and love for our enemies?