Examining the Historical Record
"Religion causes violence." This accusation, popularized by the New Atheists and repeated endlessly in secular discourse, has become almost axiomatic in contemporary culture. The Crusades, the Inquisition, religious wars, terrorism— surely these demonstrate that religion is a uniquely dangerous force that the world would be better off without?
In this lesson, we will examine this claim honestly—acknowledging the genuine violence that has been committed in religion's name while also considering the fuller picture that the "religion causes violence" narrative ignores. The historical record, carefully examined, tells a far more complex story than the simple equation of religion with violence allows.
Christians should not defensively deny that violence has been committed in Christ's name. It has, and it was wrong. But intellectual honesty requires examining whether religion is uniquely violent compared to secular alternatives, whether the violence done in religion's name reflects religion's actual teaching, and whether the good religion produces outweighs the bad.
Acknowledging Religious Violence
Let us first acknowledge the real history that critics point to:
The Crusades
The medieval Crusades involved significant violence, including atrocities committed against Muslims, Jews, and even Eastern Christians. While historians debate the complex political, economic, and defensive motivations behind the Crusades, there is no denying that terrible things were done under the banner of the cross.
The Inquisition
The various Inquisitions, particularly the Spanish Inquisition, used torture and execution against heretics, crypto-Jews, and others. While modern scholarship has revised downward the death tolls once claimed (the Spanish Inquisition executed perhaps 3,000-5,000 over 350 years, not the millions sometimes alleged), any use of violence to enforce orthodoxy is a betrayal of Christian principles.
Religious Wars
The European Wars of Religion (16th-17th centuries) between Catholics and Protestants caused immense suffering. The Thirty Years' War devastated Central Europe, killing perhaps 8 million people.
Religious Terrorism
In our own time, terrorism motivated by religious ideology has killed thousands. While most religious violence today is associated with Islamic extremism, Christians have sometimes been perpetrators as well.
These things happened. They were wrong. They violated the teachings of Jesus, who commanded us to love our enemies, turn the other cheek, and put away the sword. We should not minimize or excuse them.
The 20th Century: Atheism's Bloodbath
The claim that "religion causes violence" becomes impossible to maintain when we consider the 20th century. The most murderous regimes in human history were not religious but explicitly atheistic:
Soviet Communism
The Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin killed an estimated 20-60 million people through execution, forced labor camps (gulags), engineered famines, and political terror. The Soviet state was officially atheist, actively persecuting religion and promoting "scientific atheism" as state ideology. Churches were dynamited, priests were executed, and believers were sent to the gulag.
Lenin declared: "Every religious idea, every idea of God, even flirting with the idea of God, is unutterable vileness." This was not incidental to Communist ideology but central to it.
Maoist China
Communist China under Mao Zedong killed an estimated 40-80 million people—the highest body count of any regime in human history. The Great Leap Forward alone caused 30-45 million deaths through famine. The Cultural Revolution targeted religious believers specifically: temples were destroyed, monks were killed, and religious practice was criminalized.
Mao declared: "Religion is poison." The systematic destruction of religion was a deliberate policy of the atheist state.
Khmer Rouge Cambodia
Pol Pot's Communist regime killed approximately 2 million people— nearly 25% of Cambodia's population—in just four years (1975-1979). The Khmer Rouge was explicitly atheist, targeting Buddhist monks for execution and attempting to eradicate religion entirely. Of Cambodia's 60,000 Buddhist monks, only about 3,000 survived.
Other Atheistic Regimes
North Korea has maintained a brutal atheist dictatorship for 70+ years, with hundreds of thousands killed in political purges and prison camps. Albania under Enver Hoxha declared itself the world's first officially atheist state and brutally persecuted all religious believers.
Conservative estimates place the death toll of atheistic Communist regimes at over 100 million people in the 20th century alone— dwarfing all religious violence in all of human history combined. The Spanish Inquisition executed perhaps 5,000 over 350 years; Mao killed that many before breakfast. If we're counting bodies, atheism has far more blood on its hands than religion ever has.
What the Statistics Actually Show
If religion causes violence, we would expect religious people to be more violent than non-religious people. The empirical data consistently shows the opposite:
Crime and Incarceration
Studies consistently find that religious practice correlates with significantly lower rates of criminal behavior:
- A comprehensive review of over 400 studies found that religious involvement is associated with reduced criminal behavior across virtually every measure
- Religious youth are significantly less likely to engage in delinquency, drug use, and violent behavior
- Regular church attendance is one of the strongest predictors of avoiding criminal activity, even controlling for other socioeconomic factors
- Communities with higher religious participation have measurably lower crime rates
If religion caused violence, prisons would be full of devout believers. They're not. People with strong religious backgrounds are dramatically underrepresented in the prison population.
Charitable Giving and Tithing
Religious people don't just avoid harm—they actively do good at dramatically higher rates:
- Religious Americans give approximately four times more to charity than secular Americans—even when religious giving is excluded from the calculation
- The practice of tithing (giving 10% of income) represents billions of dollars annually directed toward education, healthcare, poverty relief, and community development
- Religious people volunteer significantly more hours than the non-religious
- Religious people are more likely to donate blood, help strangers, and return excess change to cashiers
Family Stability and Social Health
Religious practice correlates with numerous positive social outcomes:
- Lower divorce rates among couples who attend church regularly
- Lower rates of domestic violence
- Better outcomes for children raised in religious households
- Higher reported life satisfaction and happiness
- Lower rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse
- Stronger community bonds and social support networks
Mental Health and Well-Being
Research consistently shows that religious people report higher levels of psychological well-being, better coping mechanisms during hardship, and greater resilience in the face of adversity. Religious communities provide social support that combats the epidemic of loneliness in secular society.
Across dozens of studies using various methodologies, the finding is consistent: religious practice is associated with prosocial behavior and inversely associated with antisocial behavior. Religious people commit fewer crimes, give more generously, serve more readily, maintain stronger families, and contribute more to community well-being. The "religion causes violence" narrative is not merely incomplete—it is inverted.
Logical Problems with the Claim
The Genetic Fallacy
Even if religious violence were more prevalent than secular violence (which it's not), this wouldn't prove religion false. The behavior of adherents doesn't determine the truth of beliefs. Christians who commit violence are acting against their religion's teaching, not because of it.
Confusing Cause and Pretext
Much "religious" violence is actually political, ethnic, or economic conflict wearing religious clothing. The Troubles in Northern Ireland were not really about Catholic vs. Protestant theology but about Irish nationalism vs. British unionism. Religion was a marker of identity, not the actual cause of conflict.
Inconsistent Application
Critics blame religion for violence committed by religious people but rarely blame atheism for violence committed by atheists. If a Christian commits murder, religion is blamed. If an atheist commits murder, it's treated as an individual act. This double standard reveals bias, not analysis.
Ignoring What Christianity Actually Teaches
Jesus commanded His followers to love their enemies, turn the other cheek, bless those who persecute them, and put away the sword. Violence committed in Christ's name violates Christ's teaching. When Christians commit violence, they are being bad Christians—acting against their faith, not according to it.
"But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven."
— Matthew 5:44-45Christianity's Contribution to Peace and Flourishing
The narrative of religious violence ignores Christianity's enormous contributions to peace, justice, and human flourishing:
Human Dignity and Rights
The concept of universal human dignity—that every person has inherent worth regardless of status—is a Christian contribution. Human rights grew from Christian soil. The idea that the weak deserve protection, not exploitation, comes from the biblical teaching that all humans bear God's image.
Abolition of Slavery
The abolitionist movement was overwhelmingly Christian. William Wilberforce, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass, and countless others drew their opposition to slavery from Christian conviction. Churches were centers of abolitionist organizing.
Civil Rights
The American Civil Rights Movement was led by Christian ministers, organized through Black churches, and grounded in Christian theology. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a profound work of Christian ethics.
Education, Healthcare, and Humanitarian Work
Christians founded hospitals, universities, and schools across the world. The modern university grew from medieval Christian institutions. Healthcare for the poor was pioneered by religious orders. Christian organizations remain among the world's largest providers of disaster relief, poverty assistance, and refugee services.
When someone claims religion causes violence: (1) Acknowledge historical failures honestly—this builds credibility. (2) Introduce the fuller picture—the 20th century's atheistic regimes killed far more than all religious violence combined. (3) Share the statistics—religious people are actually less likely to commit crimes and more likely to contribute to society. (4) Highlight positive contributions—abolition, civil rights, hospitals, universities. (5) Point to what Jesus actually taught—love of enemies, peace, forgiveness.
Discussion Questions
- How would you respond to someone who points to the Crusades and Inquisition as evidence that religion causes violence? What context and perspective would you provide?
- The 20th century's atheistic regimes killed over 100 million people. How would you raise this point graciously without seeming to deflect from Christianity's own historical failures?
- Statistics consistently show that religious people are less likely to commit crimes, give more to charity, and contribute more to society. Why is this evidence largely unknown, and how might you share it effectively?